
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Disputes &#8211; CP LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cpllp.com/category/representative-work/disputes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cpllp.com</link>
	<description>Barrister and Solicitors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 15:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Obtained summary judgment on behalf of a client enforcing a promissory note with an extraordinary interest provision.  Due to the successful argument on the interest provision, the total award was almost eight times the principal amount of the promissory note</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/obtained-summary-judgment-on-behalf-of-a-client-enforcing-a-promissory-note-with-an-extraordinary-interest-provision-due-to-the-successful-argument-on-the-interest-provision-the-total-award-was-alm/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 15:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=1145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Alastair McNish of CP LLP was successful on a motion for summary judgment to enforce a promissory note given by a shareholder as part of a share purchase agreement. The case was unusual in that the parties had willingly negotiated a complicated – and extreme – set of interest provisions, whereby if the note was not repaid quickly, interest compounded and escalated rapidly. The Court accepted expert evidence on the...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alastair McNish of CP LLP was successful on a motion for summary judgment to enforce a promissory note given by a shareholder as part of a share purchase agreement. The case was unusual in that the parties had willingly negotiated a complicated – and extreme – set of interest provisions, whereby if the note was not repaid quickly, interest compounded and escalated rapidly. The Court accepted expert evidence on the proper calculation of interest, and found there was no reason not to enforce the terms of the promissory note. The Court also dismissed the defendant’s arguments that the agreement had been frustrated by external events, and that he should not be personally liable. The decision is a helpful reminder that parties will be held to their bargains, even when those bargains may seem odd in hindsight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discharged a certificate of pending litigation registered against a residential property operating as a bed and breakfast</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/discharged-a-certificate-of-pending-litigation-registered-against-a-residential-property-operating-as-a-bed-and-breakfast/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=1143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Michael Crampton of CP LLP successfully brought a motion to discharge a certificate of pending litigation (“CPL”) registered without notice by the opposing party against a residential property out of which CP LLP’s client operated a bed and breakfast. The court found that the opposing party that registered the CPL had failed to make full and fair disclosure on his initial motion and did not have a reasonable claim to...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Crampton of CP LLP successfully brought a motion to discharge a certificate of pending litigation (“CPL”) registered without notice by the opposing party against a residential property out of which CP LLP’s client operated a bed and breakfast. The court found that the opposing party that registered the CPL had failed to make full and fair disclosure on his initial motion and did not have a reasonable claim to an interest in the land.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2026/2026onsc1544/2026onsc1544.html">https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2026/2026onsc1544/2026onsc1544.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary judgment granted for private mortgage lender</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/summary-judgment-granted-for-private-mortgage-lender/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 19:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=1063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Overcame defaulting borrower’s attempts to delay, and obtained summary judgment for possession of the property and the full amount our client was contractually entitled to.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overcame defaulting borrower’s attempts to delay, and obtained summary judgment for possession of the property and the full amount our client was contractually entitled to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Successful arbitration to enforce contractual rights on the sale of a book of business</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/successful-arbitration-to-enforce-contractual-rights-on-the-sale-of-a-book-of-business/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 19:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=1061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Claim commenced to enforce the terms of an agreement after the purchaser of a book of business from an investment advisor sought to reduce the purchase price. The matter was converted to an arbitration and concluded with a highly favourable award for our client.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claim commenced to enforce the terms of an agreement after the purchaser of a book of business from an investment advisor sought to reduce the purchase price. The matter was converted to an arbitration and concluded with a highly favourable award for our client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defeated a purchaser’s attempt to compel the vendor in a commercial real estate acquisition to sell its land after the purchaser failed to close the transaction</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/defeated-a-purchasers-attempt-to-compel-the-vendor-in-a-commercial-real-estate-acquisition-to-sell-its-land-after-the-purchaser-failed-to-close-the-transaction/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren Nurnberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=1056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Daniel Chitiz and Michael Crampton of CP LLP successfully represented the defendant vendor in Gil Shcolyar v. Bensher Holdings Limited, 2025 ONSC 2205. The court dismissed the purchaser’s action to compel the vendor to sell its land after the purchaser failed to close the transaction. We also obtained a declaration that the vendor is entitled to retain the deposits.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span lang="EN-CA">Daniel Chitiz and Michael Crampton of CP LLP successfully represented the defendant vendor in <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2025/2025onsc2205/2025onsc2205.html"><em>Gil Shcolyar v. Bensher Holdings Limited</em></a>, 2025 ONSC 2205. The court dismissed the purchaser’s action to compel the vendor to sell its land after the purchaser failed to close the transaction. We also obtained a declaration that the vendor is entitled to retain the deposits.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defeated a motion seeking to add a company’s director to an existing multi-party employment claim for disclosing no reasonable cause of action in oppression</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/defeated-a-motion-seeking-to-add-a-companys-director-to-an-existing-multi-party-employment-claim-for-disclosing-no-reasonable-cause-of-action-in-oppression/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=1054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oppression Director liability Limitations periods]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><span lang="EN-CA">Oppression<u></u><u></u></span></li>
<li><span lang="EN-CA">Director liability<u></u><u></u></span></li>
<li><span lang="EN-CA">Limitations periods</span></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Successfully upheld a motion judge’s decision to use the court’s powers when overseeing a receivership to assign an insurance contract subject to a consent requirement for assignment</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/successfully-upheld-a-motion-judges-decision-to-use-the-courts-powers-when-overseeing-a-receivership-to-assign-an-insurance-contract-subject-to-a-consent-requirement-for-assignment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 15:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=1031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Successfully responded to an appeal in the Alberta Court of Appeal (Export Development Corporation v MNP Ltd, 2025 ABCA 25 (CanLII)). The appellant sought to set aside the court at first instance’s decision to assign claims under an insurance contract to a creditor over the insurers objection. Michael had the opportunity to share his unique insights in the legal magazine, Take Five Alberta (Feb 2025). “More than anything else,” says...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Successfully responded to an appeal in the Alberta Court of Appeal (Export Development Corporation v MNP Ltd, 2025 ABCA 25 (CanLII)). The appellant sought to set aside the court at first instance’s decision to assign claims under an insurance contract to a creditor over the insurers objection. Michael had the opportunity to share his unique insights in the legal magazine, Take Five Alberta (Feb 2025). “More than anything else,” says Michael, “the Court of Appeal’s decision … continues the trend toward broad and permissive interpretation of court powers in overseeing commercial insolvencies…”</p>
<p>Issues:</p>
<ul>
<li>Jurisdiction of the court when overseeing a receivership</li>
<li>Contractual assignment provisions</li>
<li>Harmonious application of insolvency regimes</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arbitration of a multimillion-dollar contractual dispute involving a large scale real estate development project</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/arbitration-of-a-multimillion-dollar-contractual-dispute-involving-a-large-scale-real-estate-development-project/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren Nurnberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 20:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Counsel to project managers in an arbitration to determine their compensation for overseeing a large multi-building condominium development. Obtained a highly favourable settlement on eve of hearing enabling clients to purchase the entire property. Issues: Independent business valuation Contractual interpretation Constructive trust and the duty of good faith]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Counsel to project managers in an arbitration to determine their compensation for overseeing a large multi-building condominium development. Obtained a highly favourable settlement on eve of hearing enabling clients to purchase the entire property.</p>
<p>Issues:</p>
<ul>
<li>Independent business valuation</li>
<li>Contractual interpretation</li>
<li>Constructive trust and the duty of good faith</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obtained significant trial judgement in favour of ex-spouse regarding share ownership and valuation of closely held corporation</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/obtained-significant-trial-judgement-in-favour-of-ex-spouse-regarding-share-ownership-and-valuation-of-closely-held-corporation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren Nurnberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 20:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Successful trial for the ownership and valuation of shares in a closely held corporation. Both parties asserted that the corporate minute book was inaccurate. Our client argued that the shareholder registry had not been updated to reflect her 50% ownership interest; the opposing shareholder asserted that the minute book failed to show that preferred shares had been issued on a 50-50 basis but was accurate in showing that our client...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Successful trial for the ownership and valuation of shares in a closely held corporation. Both parties asserted that the corporate minute book was inaccurate. Our client argued that the shareholder registry had not been updated to reflect her 50% ownership interest; the opposing shareholder asserted that the minute book failed to show that preferred shares had been issued on a 50-50 basis but was accurate in showing that our client held only a 30% ownership interest.</p>
<p>The court found that our client was in fact a 50% common shareholder, and the common shares in the company were valued on that basis.</p>
<p>We also advanced a constructive trust claim that the parties’ conduct over the years entitled our client to a 50% interest in the business. The trial judge also held that, even if our client did not own 50% of the common shares in fact, the court would impose a constructive trust over the 20% difference to make the parties’ ownership interests equal.</p>
<p>Our client was not statute barred from bringing the claim, as the court agreed with our position that a reasonable person would not have commenced a lawsuit while they were being treated as a 50% shareholder of the company.</p>
<p>Issues:</p>
<ul>
<li>Shareholder remedies</li>
<li>Constructive trust</li>
<li>Oppression</li>
<li>Limitation periods</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counsel to plaintiff in an investment broker negligence case</title>
		<link>https://cpllp.com/counsel-to-plaintiff-in-an-investment-broker-negligence-case/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren Nurnberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 20:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cpllp.com/?p=599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obtained highly favourable settlement on behalf of a client against a brokerage that had permitted the client’s estranged spouse to deplete hundreds of thousands of dollars from her RRSP and investment accounts without authorization. Issues: Professional negligence Breach of contract Fiduciary duty to investor Contract law]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obtained highly favourable settlement on behalf of a client against a brokerage that had permitted the client’s estranged spouse to deplete hundreds of thousands of dollars from her RRSP and investment accounts without authorization.</p>
<p>Issues:</p>
<ul>
<li>Professional negligence</li>
<li>Breach of contract</li>
<li>Fiduciary duty to investor</li>
<li>Contract law</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
